All posts tagged "Rose & Frank v ] R Crompton Ltd 1923"
Point of Law
Jun 1985 – In Shirlcar Properties Ltd v Heinitz & Another [1982], the Court stated stated that use of the expression ‘subject to contract’ did not constitute effective notice to set a rent review procedure in motion when formal notice had to be given. Use of the expression ‘without prejudice’ is widely misunderstood and so […]